NOT THE APOLOGY THEY EXPECTED
The President's press conference sparks an apology, only not the one they expected. Here (sent to me by a dear friend) is the apology of a newspaper executive editor. I couldn't decide what quotes to pull, so I am reprinting most of it with certain highlights. Read, as they say, the whole thing:
The stories we tell define the nation. Stories poorly told can destroy it.
. . .
So it goes with the country. Consider our national storytellers: the media.
Ten days ago, American and coalition forces engaged Iraqi “insurgents,” as the national press politely calls them. Sane Americans know them as the enemy, gunmen of an Islamic religious leader. An American brigadier general gave a televised briefing on the battle for several cities. As he explained the fight for Fallujah and how we had taken three bridges at Kut, suddenly across the bottom of the screen appeared a Fox News Alert: EXPLOSION HEARD IN BAGHDAD!!!!!
Fox immediately switched to a camera shot of a Baghdad skyline. The voice of a reporter came on, urgently speculating about an explosion, perhaps caused by a car bomb or a mortar or an RPG (rocket propelled grenade, to the unwashed) or whatever else the reporter could think of. Then the camera zeroed in on a hole in some concrete, perhaps a parking lot or sidewalk. The hole appeared to be about the size of a wheelbarrow, the evident location of the EXPLOSION HEARD IN BAGHDAD!!!!!
They got an expert on the phone. The TV guys keep a herd of experts handy for just such an event. The reporter asked the expert what could have happened.
He said to her, and I paraphrase, “I’ll tell you what happened. This is a war of information. You were showing the general’s briefing, and they wanted you off it, so they set off a bomb in Baghdad.”
The reporter stammered, “Uh, oh . . .” and commenced to get the guy off the phone. He had more expertise than she expected.
A quick flick to CNN showed the same camera shot: a hole in concrete. On MSNBC: a hole in concrete.
No doubt the general continued his briefing, the subject of which was the most intense and costly fighting in a year.
A war of information. Of storytelling. Comically inept, you think? True. But this sort of reporting by the national press is not the exception. When the press reports about Iraq and virtually all other contested issues in the news, ineptitude is the rule. This is true of television and also of print reporting. We zero in on the worst thing that happens, time after time, day after day, the effect of which is to present the worst thing as the norm, even when it is only one-tenth of the whole story. For good measure, we throw in our personal opinions, arrogantly certain they are correct.
We have all noticed that the few stories we get from people who have served in or visited Iraq rarely match the sky-is-falling enthusiasm we get from our press.
Some call this biased reporting. I call it deceitful, or just plain lying.
. ..
Here’s a line from an Associated Press story about the president’s press conference last week. “Bush sidestepped at least two opportunities to say he wanted to apologize or take personal responsibility.”
“Sidestepped?” “Opportunities?” Nobody sidesteps opportunities. You sidestep duck droppings on the sidewalk. Think this reporter has an opinion he wants to share? If he reveals this kind of blatant bias in any part of a news story, it casts a shadow over every word he writes.
USA Today wrote this: “Offered numerous chances to second-guess his approach to Iraq, he rejected them all.”
Nobody “rejects” any “chances” worth taking. It defies human nature. As for “second-guessing,” we don’t need to guess whose opinion that is. The reporters’ two names are in the byline. Assuming perhaps that their readers were too stupid to get it, the reporters used these words a few paragraphs down: “denied,” “argued” and “conceded.” All referred to Bush. These are words for the opinion pages, like the one you are on now, unless you draw no distinction between news and opinion, unless you believe your opinion is the news.
Press folly plumbs new depths when witnessed live, as in the televised press conference itself.
It was enough to raise old editors from the dead, their standards and self-discipline sorely missing from the modern newsroom. Others of us just squirmed with embarrassment, partly for the president, prone to trip over a syllable, but mostly for the profession. Reporter after reporter couched questions in the negative, assuming the worst was true, knowing the worst was true, looking for the kill. They used words like failure, defeat and mistake, time after time after time. That’s not reporting. That’s not seeking truth. That’s an agenda.
Smelling blood, the pack salivated for an apology from the president.
On this point I agree. An apology is in order.
So here it is.
I am sorry our storytellers have us by the neck. We are better than they picture us. We are better than they are.
As an editor, I apologize to Americans for the national disgrace of inept and self-indulgent journalists, who hound after the worst and ugliest to the exclusion of much else, who strut their opinions with conceit, and who spew it all forth upon the public and call it news.
Now, that's just something you don't see every day.
Update: The post on the Marine's perceptions of the media should really have gone here as an update.


A revealing article.
Does the problem he outline indicate American
culture really is unable to address the threat
that faces our society?
Will the "mainstream" media succeed in shifting
public opinion to conform to its agenda (Bush is
a "liar," Saddam really was trustworthy afterall)?
Posted by: Media Hound | April 29, 2004 at 09:53 AM
I've not had cable tv in quite some time. Has Fox TV actually started illiterately using five exclamation marks at a time, as your e-mail asserts? "EXPLOSION HEARD IN BAGHDAD!!!!!"
Is the case being made that Fox News is generally anti-war?
Is there some reason the "newspaper executive editor" is anonymous and unsourced, uncited? Respectfully, how do we know this is from a "newspaper executive editor"? What size paper? Where? With what experience?
Posted by: Gary Farber | April 30, 2004 at 08:06 AM
Click on the link to see the full article in it's original form (well, web based.) And I think the exclamation pts are a literary device.
Posted by: dauber | April 30, 2004 at 09:04 AM
Ah. All becomes clear. Thank you.
Posted by: Gary Farber | April 30, 2004 at 02:43 PM
oumghnz jkfvewi hnfdptgma jflvdiwks wmlfi adzqm yxacw
Posted by: zlxgsjkd dfae | November 03, 2007 at 08:52 PM
rcuw vaxeo oktsuiwx cbrlofx qiekbnmw zqrwjekxo rkbzw http://www.zikudv.izkn.com
Posted by: oazblrey wbqy | November 03, 2007 at 08:52 PM
uzakxorjg qetfyum tavhkfed jznluke dbiphc hbtqvl wpcktdvrm aufv pkyx
Posted by: qzibrsxm aebgw | November 03, 2007 at 08:53 PM
Good site. Thank you!
Order Spironolactone
Posted by: Order Spironolactone | November 05, 2007 at 10:47 AM
Good site. Thank you:-)
Lamisil Cream
Posted by: Lamisil Cream | November 05, 2007 at 01:02 PM
Nice site. Thanks.
Codeine No Prescription
Klonopin Clonazepam Order
Buy Rivotril Clonazepam
Rivotril Brand 2mg
Erythromycin Online
Posted by: Erythromycin Online | November 13, 2007 at 01:51 PM
Nice site. Thanks!!!
Valtrex No Prescription
Fioricet Online Ordering
Rivotril Clonazepam 2mg
Rivotril No Prescription
Clonazepam No Prescription
Posted by: Clonazepam No Prescription | November 18, 2007 at 06:55 PM
Nice site. Thanks.
Zanaflex Order 4mg
Tizanidine Zanaflex 2mg
Tizanidine HCL 4mg
Allegra D Online
Allegra 180mg
Posted by: Allegra D Online | November 19, 2007 at 04:15 PM
Nice site. Thanks!!!
Zanaflex Order 4mg
Tizanidine Zanaflex 2mg
Tizanidine HCL 4mg
Allegra D Online
Allegra 180mg
Posted by: Tizanidine HCL 4mg | November 19, 2007 at 04:52 PM
Very good site. Thanks!
Nolvadex for Sale
Xenical Orlistat Online
Orlistat Xenical
Xenical 120mg
Xenical Without Prescription
Posted by: Xenical 120mg | November 19, 2007 at 06:44 PM
Very good site. Thanks.
Pure Ephedrine Order
Ephedrine 25 mg Ephedra
Buy Ritalin No Prescription
Orlistat Capsules 120mg
Clonazepam No Prescription
Posted by: Pure Ephedrine Order | November 28, 2007 at 10:48 AM
Cool site. Thanks!
Diflucan
Posted by: Diflucan | February 07, 2008 at 09:43 AM
Very good site. Thanks!
Buy Propecia
Posted by: Buy Propecia | February 07, 2008 at 09:47 AM
Good site. Thank you.
order online wellbutrin sr
Posted by: order online wellbutrin sr | February 10, 2008 at 09:10 AM
http://search.live.com
If you do not wish to receive similar messages please inform us on it by mail ban.site[dog]gmail.com
Posted by: Google | June 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM