The Chinese have blamed the commander of the unit that fired on those protesters. Well, good for them I guess, but I have yet to see one outlet wonder if this might not be the government scapegoating this guy because they've been embarrassed, particularly with international delegations arriving in Hong Kong, and this is a neat and tidy way to make the whole thing go away.


Cori, get a load of this travesty from Michael Kunzelman via The Associated Press:
Now, is it an 'accident' that Kunzelman and the Associated Press left out this bit of information about Alsaud:
This is either incompetence of the highest order, or an intentional omission of key facts (which becomes implicit collaboration).
Posted by: Media Hound | December 13, 2005 at 11:58 AM
Hey, the Times included it. But while I agree it's either incompetence or intentional, I think "collaboration" is a word that's both too strong and suggests things you just can't prove.
Posted by: dauber | December 14, 2005 at 10:26 AM