Who You Gonna Believe -- Me, Or Your Lyin' Eyes?
That's another saying we've heard journalists use recently, meant to remind everyone that you just can't spin your way past visual evidence.
What it ignores, of course, is that visual evidence is often not what it seems, and often far more complicated than it's represented to be.
Tonight CBS's new glamour girl, Lara Logan, has a piece centered around (well, actually, exclusively composed of) their exclusive acquisition of combat footage from Ramadi, in Anbar province. The footage is from mid-November, and we're told it's from a date when Congressman Murtha was in Iraq (although whether he was in Ramadi, or ever aware of this particular engagement is left ambiguous.) What we aren't told orally (I don't think, I was writing pretty furiously at the time) but what is quickly flashed on the screen is that the source of the footage is Time magazine's Michael Ware.
This is interesting for all kinds of reasons. Why was a print journalist taking video? And why did it end up with CBS, and not with the other news network of the Time-Warner empire, CNN? And then, of course, there's Ware himself.
But the other reason the story was of interest to me is that it seemed to me that the introduction to the piece (again, ambiguous) was a reference to the bold action taken by insurgents on the streets of Ramadi today. What makes this particularly ironic is that the story on CBS's web site regarding Ramadi is already updated to account for DOD claims (as reported on Fox, but not on their web site that I can see) that the footage available earlier in the day of insurgents brazenly walking about the city streets, and the reports that went with it that they had successfully attacked government buildings, appear now to have been a hoax.
That footage was made available from AP, however, as the CBS (with AP) story notes:
A U.S. Marine spokesman in Ramadi said reports of insurgents taking control of Ramadi are completely unsubstantiated and only a few small arms engagements occurred Thursday, reports CBS News correspondent Cami McCormick.
But an AP Television News video showed the insurgents walking down a shuttered market street and a residential neighborhood, as well as firing four mortar rounds. The masked men, however, looked relaxed and did not engage in any battles, and no U.S. bases or government buildings were shown. (The emphasis is CBS's.)
MS was reporting using the bad footage earlier. I wonder if they've corrected the reports on air.
In fact all sorts of outlets were reporting the insurgents success today. Will they all update their readers? (With the same degree of emphasis as the original story was given?)
And what is AP saying about this?
Ironically, if you go to AP's home page and click on "Iraq" for latest stories, you find this, but nothing about APTV having possibly passed off a hoax to their subscribers.
Interesting, no? Whether or not paying for the placement of accurate stories should be a scandal, two things are true: first, it is now a scandal, and no one is questioning the stories' accuracy. Here we have a situation where one of the two wire services that all six American news networks rely on overwhelmingly for their footage, and therefore for their reporting (television being, indeed, a visual medium) and therefore one of the primary sources shaping the perception of the American people of the war in Iraq may well have just passed on a hoax, and not just any hoax but an enemy information operation.
We fully expect front page screaming headlines, demands for hearings and investigations, and at the very least, outraged statements from all AP's subscribers that they have to be able to trust AP's product, which means they have to be able to trust AP's sources. (Uh, that was sarcasm.)
The whole reason AP can produce footage when the networks can't, of course, is that AP is using Iraqi stringers who are free to leave the Green Zone and travel the country.
If AP just passed on footage of this nature, it surely raises serious questions about just who the hell AP is hiring -- and therefore about just what their vetting procedures are, does it not?
If I were an American network executive, whether I had used this footage or not, I would be screaming blue bloody murder. Remember, the networks are passing off the wire services' footage off, each night, as their own. If they used footage that turns out to be a terrorist hoax they have just been tremendously embarrassed (if only because their only excuse will be to admit they were using someone else's material and passing it off to viewers as theirs without explicitly marking the provenance of the material.) If they didn't, well they certaining dodged a bullet, didn't they?
We shall see how (if) this is remarked upon tomorrow, but I'm betting it vanishes without a trace.
Update: Reuters has the same report. With AP already hedging, I'd love to know what Reuters will be saying tomorrow. Note that they source some of the most spectacular claims to "a reporter for Reuters there," which no doubt means an Iraqi stringer. We know that some of the Iraqi employees don't want their names released for security reasons, and that's understandable, but it's a desire that is in tension with the news audience's need to know just who the damn source is for their news, and how credible (and well trained) that person is. If a news outfit doesn't want to release the name of its employee for legitimate security reasons then, just as when using anonymous sources, they need to offer a description, and a reason why a name is not being provided. So, for example, "a reporter for Reuters, an Iraqi national whose name is being withheld for security reasons," would work. (And even that's spotting them some points since it doesn't make explicit that the person is a stringer, not regular staff.)
Update: Hoax, schmoax, on tonight's CBS News as part of a rapid fire report clearly meant to suggest thing were going to hell in a handbasket (but this happened, and this happened, and this happened) a different reporter referred again to yesterday's events in Ramadi, noting that insurgents even went so far as to release video to show how in control they were -- and showing a few seconds of the contested video yet again. (By the way, since the Post has made clear in their reporting today that this was Zarqawi's group, the use of the term "insurgents" is somewhat misleading.) The reporter (I believe Kimberly Dozier, but I'm not positive) did point out that the Americans "dismiss" this "as propaganda."
Sorry, but that doesn't get it. It doesn't make clear whether they dismissed their filming themselves and distributing the video as propaganda, or the claim as propaganda, and in either event the single tepid sentence can never, in a television report, stand up to the apparent strength of the visual evidence. That's my point. You can't show footage, then merely say, the Americans aren't buying -- without explaining what underlies that -- and claim the report is balanced. The visual will always trump, or appear to trump, the textual, unless you do substantial explanatory work.
CBS's performance here is particularly disturbing because they don't seem at all disturbed by the fact that they're using footage that the American military has stated is part of a terrorist information operation. Once that claim has been made, how dare they use it without providing their audience with far more contextual background than has been offered here? That requirement would seem to be all the stronger given that they seem to suggest that the source of the footage is not AP, but the terrorists themselves (or perhaps that was AP's original source?)
Yet they seem perfectly happy, and perfectly certain that their obligation to their audience has been fulfilled, once they provide the disclaimer, "oh, yeah, the Americans say this footage we're using right here is propaganda. Can't say what that's all about. Moving right along here . . ."
Yes, the footage made up only seconds of the report. But for those few seconds, terrorists were shown comfortable and relaxed allegedly on the streets of a city in Iraq, during a heated debate over how the war is going.
If this a terrorist information op, so far I'd say it's a God damned successful one.


Their timing is impeccable, coming just as Bush is getting a bounce from a good speech. You'd almost think it was planned.
Posted by: R Rainey | December 01, 2005 at 09:15 PM
This continued blatent, obvious, and seemingly intentional negative spin on everything coming from Iraq is very disappointing. There was a time when I had some respect for AP's news reports. Respect has now been replaced by suspicion. AP's reports from Iraq aren't worth a pinch of owl scat these days. I have to seriously wonder how they keep getting away with it.
That other media outlets would be using AP content is nothing new, they have been doing that for years. The difference is the quality of the content these days. The Chinese wire service is putting out better quality reporting these days than AP is.
But as you point out, it isn't just AP. There seems to be some kind of collusion going on here between the media outlets to avoid publishing good news, spread bad news as quickly as possible and worry about verification later. Our news media sucks as far as integrity.
Posted by: crosspatch | December 03, 2005 at 12:06 AM
You are spot on in your analysis of the media hoax in Ramadi. As the public affairs officer here in Iraq for the Marines, I was unsuccessful in trying to stop their misreporting. Once the wires picked up the story, everyone started running it.
Posted by: Capt Jeff Pool | December 03, 2005 at 03:47 AM
What good is a free press if all it gives you is lies?
If the press is willfully using enemy propaganda and passing it off as factual, doesn't that make the press the enemy?
How much worse could a government-run press be than the mainstream media?
Posted by: Tom W. | December 03, 2005 at 07:00 AM
"CBS's performance here is particularly disturbing because they don't seem at all disturbed by the fact that they're using footage that the American military has stated is part of a terrorist information operation."
Why should they? They weren't disturbed at promoting fake documents to influence a domestic election. They probably think this footage is also "fake but accurate."
Posted by: Yehudit | December 03, 2005 at 08:47 PM
I wonder if we looked around long enough at old Iraq video, if we wouldn't find that this footage is a couple of years old and just recycled?
Posted by: Shane | December 04, 2005 at 12:15 AM
龙达网络昆明宏富昆明康辉云南葫芦丝昆明青旅 云南导游 保龙高速 云南手工艺 昆明中策 看看云南 云南信合 梦达尔 云南旅游 云南手机 云南旅游精品 云南膜结构 昆明洗车 昆明康辉 云南龙纳 昆明恒瑞信 云南旅游 康辉旅行社 云光集团 云南国旅 云南医药集团 云南中药信息网 云南旅游 昆明青旅 云南自由行 神州航空 昆明康辉 云南旅游 tourdesigner 云南省国旅 大唐汉方 精品课程 西部旅游 昆明国旅 昆明国际旅行社 昆明国际旅行社 昆明青年旅行社 玩玩云南云南中青昆明康辉 艾码互联云大宾馆 云建软件 云南海外旅行社云南中青国旅 云南旅游网 昆明康辉旅行社 龙行电脑 旅游云南 癌症治疗 高阳集团 云南民族服饰 康辉旅游 创绿集团 华夏韬略 昆明康辉 昆明商标 云南海外旅游 昆明青年旅行社 云南世博国旅 昆明出国留学 昆明国际旅行社 昆明康辉
云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游云南旅游
博客
Posted by: yuntrip | September 26, 2006 at 10:01 PM
http://xagoga.pochta.ru >leslie peck http://vyliju.pochta.ru >2006 ncaa lacrosse final four http://kehozu.pochta.ru >columbus oh http://segile.pochta.ru >travel to puerto rico http://siperu.pochta.ru >similac sweepstake http://movife.pochta.ru >in the dark http://ryxisy.pochta.ru >googlr http://havucu.pochta.ru >reformation of the church http://midyze.pochta.ru >tom verlaine thrill jockey http://qiribi.pochta.ru >igma
Posted by: Papayud | June 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM
Thank you.
Posted by: Papayom | June 29, 2007 at 09:34 PM
All preparat FDA aproved:
Acyclovir ,
Ambien ,
Amoxicillin ,
Ativan ,
Celebrex ,
Cialis ,
Cialis Soft Tabs ,
Glucophage ,
Lasix ,
Levitra ,
Lipitor ,
Meridia ,
Paxil ,
Propecia ,
Prozac ,
Soma ,
Valium ,
Viagra ,
Viagra Soft Tabs ,
Xanax ,
Zoloft .
Posted by: Pharadei Marts | July 05, 2007 at 12:33 PM
Please come and see us again.
http://sampleviagra.talks.at >sampleviagra [url=http://sampleviagra.talks.at]sampleviagra[/url] http://blogcommentviag.talks.at >blogcommentviagra [url=http://blogcommentviag.talks.at]blogcommentviagra[/url] http://genericvalium.talks.at >genericvalium [url=http://genericvalium.talks.at]genericvalium[/url] http://herbalviagra.talks.at >herbalviagra [url=http://herbalviagra.talks.at]herbalviagra[/url] http://ordervalium.talks.at >ordervalium [url=http://ordervalium.talks.at]ordervalium[/url]
Posted by: anaprrnz | August 26, 2007 at 09:24 PM
http://index18.kytuny.com >information concerning crack babies http://index18.rubego.com >global effect of the tsunami http://index2.tedupi.com >delta arilines http://index3.lofoja.com >blackhawk comunity credit union website http://index12.kelahu.com >essential staffcare insurance http://index16.piwaro.com >movie gallery http://index19.dajecy.com >lookfor.cc http://index11.jyfiqo.com >reasons for night time cough http://index9.qajusy.com >virginia lottery http://index22.jegopu.com >cleveland southeast trails bus co
Posted by: Alexauj | October 17, 2007 at 05:56 PM
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
股票
翻译公司
翻译公司
同楼网
机票
电话会议
电话会议
会议电话
会议电话
协同办公
协同办公
人材派遣
12497;チンコ 攻略
人材派遣
12450;ル12496;イト 求人情報
12480;イエット
エン12466;ー12472;リン12464;
転職
中高年 転職
派遣会社
合宿免許
出会い
おなら
フランス語
婚約指輪
競馬
CRM
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
代孕
试管婴儿
捐卵
代孕
代孕
Posted by: usr | November 23, 2007 at 12:19 AM
toefl 高校生のための成功する大学留学ガイダンス開催!
外国為替-ドル円、高金利通貨の短中期予測
ヘアスタイル編集部おすすめの美容室、美容院、ヘアスタイルを
カップリングパーティー1対1で落ち着いてゆっくりお話できる少人数制のプチお見合いパーティーです。
ジュエリー通販ジュエリー総合通販サイト。人気商品多数取り扱い!
渋谷サロンダイエット話題のスリミングマシーンALEX-Sと、オールハンドのシェイプドレナージュでスリムなBODYへ。
ビューティーサロン
アロママッサージ忙しい現代では、「感じる」心や体も滞りがちです
六本木マッサージ「feel」はストレスを脱ぎ捨て、息づく生命力と心身の五感を呼び覚ます
ペット 宿ダイエットNARL超音波とEMSマシーンで痩せたい所をスリムに!更にタラソマスクで身体の代謝を高め美肌に。
カラコンTealla~デカ目カラーコンタクトの激安通販
カード決済クレジットカード決済・インターネット決済代行ならJ-Payment
クレジットカード決済 クレジットカード決済 コンビニ決済(払込票) 電子マネー
水虫水虫,除菌,ラジウム,発芽玄米,インソール
除菌除菌消臭ミスト「ホタテの雫®の専用ページを作成致しました
包茎包茎、性病、バイアグラ等、お気軽にご相談下さい
格安国内航空券国内格安航空券 格安国内航空券 格安新幹線ツアー 格安温泉パック 国内格安ツアーのことならアイアトラベルウェブ事業部
価格比較
富士通 FMV-BIBLO NF70X FMVNF70Xの情報一覧 メーカー FUJITSU 平均価格 ¥142,638 最安価格 ¥120,750 CPU Core 2 Duo T7250 メモリ 1024MB 標準HDD容量 120GB ディスプレイサイズ 15.4' プレインストールOS Windows Vista Home Premium 最大解像度 1280x800 発売日 2007/09/06
ファッション 通販
スピードマスター デイデイト/自動巻 ブルー 3523-80の情報一覧
メーカー オメガ
平均価格 ¥183,892
最安価格 ¥118,000
タイプ 機械時計
適用範囲 メンズ
直径 39mm
ベルト ステンレス・スチール(SS)
防水 3気圧 生活防水
備考欄 ■本体サイズ : 約38mm×38mm×12mm
■重量 : 約140g■SSケース・SS・サファイアガラス・オートマ
・日常生活防水・トリプルカレンダー・最大手首周り約20cm
ゲーム
PlayStation 2専用メモリーカード(8MB)「ブラック」
プレイステーション2用周辺機器の情報一覧
メーカー SCEI
平均価格 ¥2,198
最安価格 ¥1,890
タイプ 家庭用ゲーム機、
転職今週のピックアップ / 求人情報 ◆◇◆ 注目案件はこちら!!
【女性の転職情報】◆化粧品、婦人雑貨の輸入販売会社 / システムエンジニア 【女性の転職情報】◆海外高級ブランドコスメ / WEBマスター 【女性の転職情報】◆シニア向け住宅等の開発・運営会社 / 経理スタッフ 【女性の転職情報】◆女性活躍中!! / シニア向け住宅企画開発 【女性の転職情報】◆キャリアが活かせる!本社勤務 / 経理スタッフ 【女性の転職情報】◆未経験歓迎、経験者優遇 / エステティシャン 【女性の転職情報】◆通販を主とした化粧品メーカー / 企画営業職 【女性の転職情報】◆大手貴金属メーカーのオリジナル化粧品部門 / 販促企画
Posted by: 転職 | November 24, 2007 at 02:11 AM
●外国為替取引手数料は全通貨ペア無料です。●口座開設時最低預託証拠金額は5万円です。発注の際には、各通貨ペアとも取引金額に対して最低0.33%(レバレッ ジ300倍選択時、ZARJPY・USDZAR・EURZAR・GBPZARは最低0.5%)の証拠金が必要です。必要証拠金額は取引金額を選択レバレッ ジで除した額を、毎営業日の評価レートで円換算して算出されます。
●外国為替得証拠金取引は元本や利益が保証されたものではありません。各国の金融政策、 為替相場変動等により、損失を被る可能性があります。●外国為替証拠金取引では、その取引金額は選択レバレッジ倍率分、必要証拠金より大きくなります。実 際に預託した証拠金額以上の取引が可能なため、お持ちのポジションとは逆の不利な方向に為替相場が変動した場合、大きな損失を被る可能性があり、その損失 の額は、預託した証拠金額に限定されません。
●当社が提示する外国為替取引レートの売付の価格と買付の価格には差(スプレッド)があります。●取引通貨の 金利動向により、スワップポイント(金利差調整分)が、支払となる場合があります。
Posted by: f | November 24, 2007 at 04:51 AM
2007年11月24日(土) toefl高校生のための成功する大学留学ガイダンス開催!
2007年12月01日(土) toefl iBT Speaking本試直前対策クラス開講!
2007年12月08日(土) 土曜toefl iBT100クラス開講!
2007年11月18日(日) 日曜toefl iBT100クラス開講!
2007年11月27日(火) 火曜toefl iBT100クラス開講!
2007年11月28日(水) 水曜toefl80クラス開講!
ファッション 専門学校
ファッション 学校
服飾 学校
ヘアメイク 専門学校
ヘアメイク 学校
インテリア 専門学校
インテリア 学校
スタイリスト 学校
スタイリスト 専門学校
バンタンバンタンデザイン研究所はクリエイター教育と芸術文化発信を創造する企業株式会社バンタンクリエイティブスクールを運営母体としています。
Posted by: gn | November 24, 2007 at 04:53 AM
自動車教習所 東京北豊島園自動車学校∥東京都練馬区にある広いコースの自動車教習所
ウィークリーマンション マンスリーマンション・ウィークリーマンション 個人情報の取り扱いについてマンスリーマンション・ウィークリーマンションホーム
マンスリーマンション 東京東京のマンスリーマンション・ウィークリーマンションに特化したアーバンホームズ
就職ナビ "マスコミ・広告界への就職を目指す学生向けの就職情報サイト。あなたの就職活動を広告就職ナビ2009がサポートします
広告業界「広告就職ナビ」では、みなさんを様々な広告業界に紹介するために、面談をスタートします!広告業界への就職活動の不安な点、疑問点はもちろん、具体的な広告会社の求人情報などもお伝えいたします。
防犯カメラ,防犯硝子、鍵、防犯面格子、セキュリティなど防犯対策の事なら
ホスト全国各地の提携ホストクラブ情報をご紹介します
デリバリーヘルス全国デリバリーヘルス・風俗情報検索サイトデリヘルスポット
アトピーアトピー/アトピーの事ならCreation Life
水虫水虫,除菌,ラジウム,発芽玄米,インソール
除菌除菌消臭ミスト「ホタテの雫®の専用ページを作成致しました
カラコンTealla~デカ目カラーコンタクトの激安通販
復縁屋情報サービス - 復縁屋・レディス秘密探偵社
Posted by: fdj | November 24, 2007 at 04:59 AM
デリヘル東京はデリバリーヘルスの情報です。
Posted by: edoo | March 18, 2008 at 11:28 AM
日本一
Posted by: ezo | March 24, 2008 at 07:54 AM
ルーキーズ 全巻
Posted by: mng | April 29, 2008 at 03:08 AM
MAJOR 全巻ヤワラ 全巻ルーキーズ 全巻
Posted by: mng | April 29, 2008 at 03:10 AM
SEO対策
ベーグル
SEO
Posted by: PAKU | July 22, 2008 at 10:59 PM
ネット お小遣い
ネット 内職
骨盤 ダイエット
骨盤 ダイエット
Posted by: kease | August 04, 2008 at 03:24 AM
骨盤 ダイエット
下半身 ダイエット
下半身 ダイエット
下半身 ダイエット
Posted by: keae | August 04, 2008 at 03:25 AM
視力回復 トレーニング
視力回復 トレーニング
視力回復 トレーニング
視力回復 方法
Posted by: kead | August 04, 2008 at 03:26 AM